| Home |
| About AATG |
| Listserv |
| Membership |
| Forms |
| Local Chapters |
| Teaching Resources |
| Promoting German |
| Prof. Development |
| Student Programs |
| Publications |
| AATG Store |
| Give to AATG |
| Contact AATG |
| Search |
| Advocacy Plan from Minnesota |
|
Making Decisions of Language Offerings in a School District A process from the Forest Lake Area School District, Forest Lake, MN The past few years the community in and around Forest Lake, MN has been discussing the possibility of offering students the opportunity to learn Chinese and Arabic. Several parents asked the school district administrators if either of these languages could be offered, and the district decided to consider this issue. The following is the process that our district used to answer the community’s questions. After discussions with the district’s world language department, our Curriculum and Instruction administrator proposed the establishment of a World Language Task Force to our school board.
The Task Force comprised the following members:
Desired outcomes:
Timeline:
An important factor to the success of the pre-Task Force planning was designating our Director of Teaching and Learning to solicit its members.
Our first meeting was dedicated to the following: - confirming meeting dates
Ground Rules Discussion is open, and members are invited to participate equitably.Meetings are conducted in a professional manner by facilitator and members.
Communicate effectively and politely.
Questions to be Answered:
Over the course of six meetings from October to early December 2007, we researched and discussed the questions above. Our discussions were based on that research and information we received about teacher availability from the post-secondary educators and the local immersion school. We also used data collected from surveys conducted in our schools and in the community about world language offerings. Finally, we took into account school monetary issues and logistics.
Conclusions There is community support for all of the current language offerings in the school district, as well as the interest in the offering of Chinese (by parents), Japanese (by students) and ASL (by students). The availability of Chinese teachers at the moment was none, due to visa restrictions with China, and all available teachers getting certification currently already had placements, so Chinese was currently not a viable option. Japanese teachers are available in our area. We also recognized that the school district was unwilling to allow classes below a certain numbers of students. With the addition of a language, the smaller programs would be at risk. We did not envision the enough of the present pool of students wanting to take a world language to increase by “a whole program” worth of students. To have healthy programs, teachers need to have stability, and this would not be feasible unless the district were willing to change its class size policy. As the post-secondary educators stated, it would be a waste to put healthy, community supported programs at risk, just because a language was added, whose success was not guaranteed. Once a student has learned one language, learning a second is helpful. Our decision was to keep the current offerings (German, French and Spanish). Since there is support for Chinese and Japanese (and ASL), the addition of those languages would be discussed by a future task force, if circumstances would seem fortuitous for such a discussion. For German and French, this process offered an opportunity to advocate for and support these languages. The Task Force with its representative membership from a variety of school and community constituents reviewed the benefits of the presently offered languages for our students, not just the benefits of a potential new offering.
Reported by Kristina Kvarnlov-Leverty |